Topics for Brno F2F
In yesterday's BAC monthly meeting, each community was required to have a topic list before the Brno F2F meeting in May. For the committers community, what do you guys like to put on the list?
For me personally, I find involving the Rust language into the project interests me a lot. So, topics:
Rust. Providers implemented in Rust? Or we can refactor some core code of OpenSSL by using Rust?
TBD...
Frederik Wedel-HeinenWed 15 Apr 2026 9:57AM
Pull request backlog is growing out of control and needs stronger management
Need for an OpenSSL roadmap to align development across core team and contributor boundaries
AI policy finalized - we experience a lot of PRs (and issues) generated by AI, what is the policy?
Here are some more points. Please let me know if it needs elaboration.
Paul YangThu 16 Apr 2026 3:00AM
@Frederik Wedel-Heinen I am interested in 2 and 3
Dmitry BelyavskyFri 17 Apr 2026 1:46PM
@Frederik Wedel-Heinen In my committer's hat I'm interested in all these points
Frederik Wedel-HeinenWed 15 Apr 2026 10:01AM
Rust is definitely interesting. I am concerned if we have enough knowledge to process PR’s. I think a strategy needs to be in place and possible risks should be addressed.
Paul YangThu 16 Apr 2026 3:03AM
I would like to raise a new one: the Mythos, how will these kind of models affect the security of open source software, say OpenSSL as an example
Richard Levitte (individual)Thu 16 Apr 2026 7:27AM
Note on writing providers in Rust: if someone external already does, I'd like to see it!
I've played with writing a provider in Zig, and found a major difficulty... ERR upcall core_vset_error use a C va_list parameter , and I got into a type conflict trying to use the Zig construct for those. It would be interesting to see how that's dealt with in Rust.
Simo SorceThu 16 Apr 2026 1:35PM
@Richard Levitte (individual) a lot of unsafe {} is needed to deal with C interfaces, especially OpenSSL which is found of function pointers and pointer overloading, here you can see an example here: https://github.com/QUBIP/openssl-provider-forge-rs
Richard Levitte (individual)Fri 17 Apr 2026 9:02AM
@ssorce, thanks for the link! That gave me cause to add a section on support libraries in https://github.com/provider-corner?view_as=public
Richard Levitte (individual)Thu 16 Apr 2026 12:23PM
I'd like to see a discussion around the function of addrev, and especially where it takes its data from.
Inspired by git's gpg.ssh.allowedSignersFile, I think it would be possible to have a minimum bit of data necessary to perform what addrev does on file in the repository, and that file would be subject to review and approval like every other file.
Simo Sorce ·Tue 14 Apr 2026 1:02PM
Sounds like a good topic